# ODIN, Windows 11 build 26200, Route Map 0.4.0-beta.1 (build run 38110032290), 11 Oct 2026:
# routemap-cli.exe -4 heise.de --paths. Hops 1 to 6 are the tester's home network and ISP:
# their addresses are replaced by documentation addresses and their places by "Manila, PH".
# Everything else is as printed.
Built-in Paris, TCP port 443 · at least 16 paths · 64 flows · 1453 probes in 342 s
   #  Paths  Location               Address                                    Avg ms  Loss
   1  A B C D E F G H I J K L M local / ISP internal   198.51.100.1                                    1.4   50%
   2  all    local / ISP internal   198.51.100.2                                   2.3    0%
   3                                *                                                  100%
   4  A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Manila, PH             198.51.100.46                                66.2   33%
  4a  A D E K L M N Manila, PH             198.51.100.42                                65.3
  4b  B C F G H I J O P Manila, PH             198.51.100.46                                65.9
   5  A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Manila, PH             198.51.100.145                               6.9    0%
  5a  A C E I Manila, PH             198.51.100.145                               6.2
  5b  B N O P Manila, PH             198.51.100.139                               9.6
  5c  D J K  Manila, PH             198.51.100.141                              11.2
  5d  F G H L M Manila, PH             198.51.100.143                               6.0
   6  A B C D E F H I J K L M N O P Hong Kong, HK          203.0.113.65                               43.0   17%
  6a  A      Manila, PH             203.0.113.123                              27.6
  6b  B F H L M N O P Hong Kong, HK          62.115.209.158                               63.1
  6c  C E I  Manila, PH             203.0.113.65                               42.7
  6d  D J    Manila, PH             203.0.113.229                              31.6
  6e  K      Manila, PH             203.0.113.39                               51.4
   7         Singapore, SG          62.115.137.184                              131.2   33%
   8  A B F G H N O P Singapore, SG          62.115.140.40                               182.2   10%
  8a  A F H P Singapore, SG          62.115.139.44                                55.3
  8b  B      Marseille, FR          62.115.142.242                              204.2
  8c  G      Marseille, FR          62.115.122.27                               216.4
  8d  N      Marseille, FR          62.115.140.40                               194.0
  8e  O      Marseille, FR          62.115.140.42                               193.2
   9  A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Frankfurt, DE          62.115.136.250                              216.2    0%
  9a  A B D E F G H O P Lappersdorf, DE        5.56.18.114                                 249.8
  9b  C      Frankfurt, DE          62.115.136.250                              234.9
  9c  I      Marseille, FR          62.115.140.40                               203.1
  9d  J L    Frankfurt, DE          62.115.143.22                               224.7
  9e  K      Marseille, FR          62.115.140.50                               190.1
  9f  M      Marseille, FR          62.115.140.38                               191.4
  9g  N      Frankfurt, DE          62.115.124.60                               224.3
  10         Frankfurt, DE          62.115.132.229                              234.8   20%
  11  C D F G I J K L Frankfurt, DE          62.115.153.153                              220.4   25%
 11a  C D G J L Chicago, US            62.115.153.153                              255.4
 11b  F      Frankfurt, DE          62.115.132.227                              202.7
 11c  I K    Frankfurt, DE          62.115.132.229                              202.1
  12  A C D F G H I J K L M N                        62.115.153.153                              251.7   25%
 12a  A C D F J L M Frankfurt am Main, DE  82.98.102.79                                254.5
 12b  G I K N Chicago, US            62.115.153.153                              249.6
 12c  H      Frankfurt am Main, DE  82.98.102.1                                 252.6
  13  A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Hanover, DE            193.99.144.80                               250.6    0%
 13a  A B C E H I J N O P Hanover, DE            193.99.144.80                               250.0
 13b  D F K L M Frankfurt am Main, DE  82.98.103.3                                 255.2
 13c  G      Frankfurt am Main, DE  82.98.102.1                                 247.0
  14  G      Frankfurt am Main, DE  82.98.103.3                                 249.7   50%
  15  G      Hanover, DE            193.99.144.80                               251.3   50%
  16                                *                                                  100%
  17  D F K L M Hanover, DE            193.99.144.80                               254.4   50%
  18                                *                                                  100%
  19                                *                                                  100%
  20         Hanover, DE            193.99.144.80                               253.3   50%
  21         Hanover, DE            193.99.144.80                               325.6    0%

Path  Flows   Differs at                   RTT to target   Loss to target
A     4/27    hop 1 local / ISP internal,  253.9 ms        10% (1 of 10)
B     3/27    hop 1 local / ISP internal,  251.6 ms        0% (0 of 10)
C     2/27    hop 1 local / ISP internal,  240.5 ms        30% (3 of 10)
D     2/27    hop 1 local / ISP internal,  246.7 ms        90% (9 of 10)
E     2/27    hop 1 local / ISP internal,  241.6 ms        20% (2 of 10)
F     2/27    hop 1 local / ISP internal,  242.9 ms        20% (2 of 10)
G     2/27    hop 1 local / ISP internal,  254.0 ms        20% (2 of 10)
H     2/27    hop 1 local / ISP internal,  259.7 ms        50% (5 of 10)
I     1/27    hop 1 local / ISP internal,  254.2 ms        20% (2 of 10)
J     1/27    hop 1 local / ISP internal,  250.4 ms        50% (5 of 10)
K     1/27    hop 1 local / ISP internal,  242.0 ms        50% (5 of 10)
L     1/27    hop 1 local / ISP internal,  253.6 ms        30% (3 of 10)
M     1/27    hop 1 local / ISP internal,  249.5 ms        70% (7 of 10)
N     1/27    hop 4 Manila, PH     , hop 5 251.0 ms        10% (1 of 10)
O     1/27    hop 4 Manila, PH     , hop 5 251.6 ms        20% (2 of 10)
P     1/27    hop 4 Manila, PH     , hop 5 252.9 ms        30% (3 of 10)
"At least": some load balancers do not spread TCP probes.
