Specification Quality Checklist: Root Project Layout

Purpose: Review specification completeness before planning. Created: 2026-10-29 Feature: spec.md

Content Quality

• [x] Requirements describe contributor, consumer, and operator outcomes; technical names appear where explicitly requested or needed for compatibility.
• [x] User value and story priorities are stated.
• [x] Journeys are understandable without implementation algorithms.
• [x] Mandatory specification sections are complete.

Requirement Completeness

• [x] No unresolved clarification markers remain.
• [x] Requirements define observable behavior and explicit destinations.
• [x] Success criteria are measurable.
• [x] Outcomes emphasize complete artifacts, working workflows, preserved deployments, and discoverable documents rather than implementation algorithms.
• [x] Acceptance scenarios cover builds, installation, development, containers, Pages, releases, and Spec-Kit.
• [x] Edge cases cover stale/corrupted assets, missing toolchains, environments, path changes, and numbering.
• [x] Scope excludes domain changes, deployment execution, and unrelated upgrades.
• [x] Dependencies, baseline, runtime policy, and operator-supplied settings are identified.

Feature Readiness

• [x] FR-001–FR-022 map to acceptance scenarios and the plan's validation matrix.
• [x] Consumer/contributor/operator/maintainer journeys are covered.
• [x] SC-001–SC-007 can be verified without a production deployment.
• [x] Hook algorithms, Docker stages, Wrangler fields, and sequencing are reserved for design artifacts.

Review Notes

Reviewed against the agreed conversation and resolved Spec-Kit template on 2026-10-29. Paths, distribution formats, Docker/Compose, Gunicorn, Wrangler, and Spec-Kit are user-mandated constraints for this developer-facing refactor.

Checked items record requirements quality only. Implementation and runtime acceptance checks have not been performed.