Runtime requirements review checklist
Purpose: PR reviewer review before implementation. Reviewed with the user on 2026-10-14; the user approved the three recommended clarifications. Created: 2026-10-13 Feature: spec.md
Completeness / clarity
- [x] CHK001 Are runtime/build tools, local storage, and process limits distinguished? [Clarity, FR-001/007/010, Spec §Assumptions]
- [x] CHK002 Are fresh setup, populated upgrades, backup/restore, and installed artifacts covered without implying completed tests? [Completeness, FR-003/015, SC-002/007]
- [x] CHK003 Are disabled capabilities distinct from outages and unknown values? [Consistency, FR-009, contracts/admin-api.md]
- [x] CHK004 Are retry limits, interruption, reopening, and deduplication consistent? [Coverage, FR-005/006, data-model.md]
- [x] CHK005 Are edits/deletions, suspension, expired dates, filters, and current credentials covered before delivery? [Completeness, FR-008, Spec §Edge Cases]
Acceptance / scope
- [x] CHK006 Are timing/HTTP responsiveness measurable with fixture assumptions? [Measurability, SC-004]
- [x] CHK007 Are login/CSRF, deep links, asset/API errors, and protected files covered? [Coverage, FR-002/008/014, SC-007]
- [x] CHK008 Is distributed regression required while distributed outbox adoption stays outside scope? [Consistency, SC-006, research.md §R4]
- [x] CHK009 Are bounded recent history and durable pending delivery distinguished? [Clarity, FR-006/009, data-model.md]
- [x] CHK010 Are all requirements/stories traced to tests, paths, and ordered tasks? [Traceability, tasks.md, analysis report]
Review evidence
CHK001/003/006/007/008/009/010 passed against the specification, contracts, and task traceability. CHK002 is resolved by packaged migration requirements in contracts/runtime.md. CHK004 and CHK005 are resolved by explicit acceptance/failure and UTC expiry rules in data-model.md. All 15 functional requirements and eight success criteria have tasks. These checks assess requirements quality; implementation remains pending.