Review this idea for the problem below. Work through the nine parts in order and keep them separate.

$frame

Idea:
$idea

1. Value: what is genuinely good about this idea, and under what conditions would it be valuable?
2. Reality: does the mechanism hold? List concrete problems, unsupported claims, and places where the idea is witty rather than functional.
3. Devil's advocate: the strongest reasons it would fail in practice.
4. Novelty: name the closest existing solution or practice you know of, say how this idea differs, and grade novelty from 0 (it already exists) to 4 (you know of nothing close). In "closest", name them in one or two sentences; if you are unsure, end with "(unverified)". Do not mention your tools.
5. Effort: how much effort it would take to carry out: small, medium or large.
6. Impact: if it works, how much would it do for what the problem says a good idea is: small, medium or large, with one sentence on why.
7. Confidence: how likely it is to work as described, given the problems above: low, medium or high, with the one assumption it most depends on.
8. Concrete: does the idea say who does what first? Answer true or false.
9. Limits: does the idea break a hard constraint, fail a must-have, or not address the problem at all? Be strict about real violations and generous about everything else.

Return only JSON, with no other text:
{"value": "...", "reality": {"holds": true, "issues": ["..."]}, "risks": ["..."], "novelty": {"closest": "...", "delta": "...", "grade": 2}, "effort": "medium", "impact": {"level": "medium", "reason": "..."}, "confidence": {"level": "medium", "reason": "..."}, "concrete": true, "requirements": {"pass": true, "violations": []}}
