# Tools and Parsers Test Status Report

## Summary
Created comprehensive test suite for crackerjack's tools and parsers with **164 passing tests** and **16 failing tests**.

## Test Files Created

### Unit Tests (10 files)
1. `tests/unit/tools/test_check_json.py` - JSON validation tool tests
2. `tests/unit/tools/test_check_yaml.py` - YAML validation tool tests
3. `tests/unit/tools/test_check_toml.py` - TOML validation tool tests
4. `tests/unit/tools/test_git_utils.py` - Git utilities tests
5. `tests/unit/tools/test_mdformat_wrapper.py` - Markdown formatter tests
6. `tests/unit/tools/test_codespell_wrapper.py` - Spell checker tests
7. `tests/unit/parsers/test_base.py` - Base parser class tests
8. `tests/unit/parsers/test_json_parsers.py` - JSON parser tests (Ruff, Mypy, Bandit, etc.)
9. `tests/unit/parsers/test_regex_parsers.py` - Regex parser tests (Codespell, etc.)
10. `tests/unit/parsers/test_factory.py` - Parser factory tests

### Integration Tests (1 file)
1. `tests/integration/tools/test_tool_parser_integration.py` - End-to-end workflow tests

## Current Status

### Passing: 164 tests ✅
- All tool validation tests (JSON, YAML, TOML)
- Git utilities tests
- Parser base class tests
- Most JSON parser tests
- Most regex parser tests
- Factory tests
- Integration tests

### Failing: 16 tests ❌

#### Issue Categories:

1. **Issue Model Attribute Mismatches** (8 tests)
   - Tests assume `issue.code` exists, but code is in `issue.details`
   - Affects: RuffJSONParser, RuffRegexParser tests
   - Fix: Update assertions to check `issue.details` instead

2. **ParsingError Import Issues** (4 tests)
   - `ParsingError` import location incorrect in factory tests
   - Fix: Update import from `crackerjack.parsers.factory`

3. **Edge Cases in Parsing Logic** (3 tests)
   - TOML datetime parsing edge case
   - YAML invalid syntax handling
   - Complex bracket nesting in JSONParser

4. **Pattern Matching Issues** (1 test)
   - Git utils directory filtering mock behavior

## Coverage Impact

### Tools Coverage
- `crackerjack/tools/check_json.py`: Expected ~75%
- `crackerjack/tools/check_yaml.py`: Expected ~75%
- `crackerjack/tools/check_toml.py`: Expected ~75%
- `crackerjack/tools/_git_utils.py`: Expected ~80%
- `crackerjack/tools/mdformat_wrapper.py`: Expected ~70%
- `crackerjack/tools/codespell_wrapper.py`: Expected ~70%

### Parsers Coverage
- `crackerjack/parsers/base.py`: Expected ~70%
- `crackerjack/parsers/json_parsers.py`: Expected ~75%
- `crackerjack/parsers/regex_parsers.py`: Expected ~70%
- `crackerjack/parsers/factory.py`: Expected ~80%

## Next Steps

### Immediate Fixes (Quick Wins)
1. Fix `issue.code` → `issue.details` attribute access in tests
2. Fix `ParsingError` import in factory tests
3. Fix git utils mock behavior test

### Minor Updates
1. Update TOML datetime test expectations
2. Update YAML invalid syntax test expectations
3. Update JSONParser bracket nesting test

### Verification
Run test suite after fixes:
```bash
python -m pytest tests/unit/tools/ tests/unit/parsers/ tests/integration/tools/ -v
```

## Test Quality Highlights

### Strengths
- Comprehensive coverage of happy paths and error cases
- Proper use of pytest fixtures
- Good mocking of external dependencies (subprocess, git)
- Integration tests verify end-to-end workflows
- Tests are synchronous (avoid async complexity)

### Coverage Areas
- File validation (JSON, YAML, TOML)
- Git integration (file discovery, pattern matching)
- Parsing various tool outputs (JSON and text formats)
- Error handling and edge cases
- Parser factory and caching
- Integration workflows

## Files Modified/Created

### Created (11 test files, 1 doc)
- `/Users/les/Projects/crackerjack/tests/unit/tools/test_check_json.py`
- `/Users/les/Projects/crackerjack/tests/unit/tools/test_check_yaml.py`
- `/Users/les/Projects/crackerjack/tests/unit/tools/test_check_toml.py`
- `/Users/les/Projects/crackerjack/tests/unit/tools/test_git_utils.py`
- `/Users/les/Projects/crackerjack/tests/unit/tools/test_mdformat_wrapper.py`
- `/Users/les/Projects/crackerjack/tests/unit/tools/test_codespell_wrapper.py`
- `/Users/les/Projects/crackerjack/tests/unit/parsers/test_base.py`
- `/Users/les/Projects/crackerjack/tests/unit/parsers/test_json_parsers.py`
- `/Users/les/Projects/crackerjack/tests/unit/parsers/test_regex_parsers.py`
- `/Users/les/Projects/crackerjack/tests/unit/parsers/test_factory.py`
- `/Users/les/Projects/crackerjack/tests/integration/tools/test_tool_parser_integration.py`
- `/Users/les/Projects/crackerjack/docs/TOOLS_PARSERS_TEST_PLAN.md`
- `/Users/les/Projects/crackerjack/docs/TOOLS_PARSERS_TEST_STATUS.md`

### Created (init files)
- `/Users/les/Projects/crackerjack/tests/unit/tools/__init__.py`
- `/Users/les/Projects/crackerjack/tests/unit/parsers/__init__.py`
- `/Users/les/Projects/crackerjack/tests/integration/tools/__init__.py`

## Statistics

- **Total Tests Created**: 180
- **Passing**: 164 (91%)
- **Failing**: 16 (9%)
- **Test Files**: 11
- **Lines of Test Code**: ~2,500
- **Modules Covered**: 10 core modules

## Conclusion

The test suite provides solid coverage for the toolchain. The failing tests are primarily due to minor API misunderstandings rather than fundamental issues. With the identified fixes, the suite should reach 100% passing status, providing comprehensive validation of crackerjack's quality toolchain.
