# TestPyPI Validation Report

**Package**: `gremlin-critic==0.2.0`
**TestPyPI URL**: https://test.pypi.org/project/gremlin-critic/0.2.0/
**Date**: February 14, 2026
**Status**: PASSED

---

## Test Environment

- **Python**: 3.14 (clean venv, no prior gremlin install)
- **Platform**: macOS Darwin 24.6.0 (Apple Silicon)
- **Install command**:
  ```bash
  pip install --index-url https://test.pypi.org/simple/ \
      --extra-index-url https://pypi.org/simple \
      gremlin-critic==0.2.0
  ```

---

## Test Results

### 1. Installation (PASS)

Package installed successfully with all dependencies resolved:
- `anthropic==0.79.0`, `typer==0.23.1`, `rich==14.3.2`, `pyyaml==6.0.3`
- All transitive dependencies installed without conflicts

### 2. CLI Commands (PASS)

| Command | Result |
|---------|--------|
| `gremlin --version` | `gremlin version 0.2.0` |
| `gremlin --help` | Shows commands: review, patterns, learn |
| `gremlin review --help` | Shows all options including `--validate` |
| `gremlin patterns list` | Lists 7 universal categories, 12 domains |
| `gremlin patterns show payments` | Shows 8 payment patterns with keywords |

### 3. Python API Imports (PASS)

```python
from gremlin import Gremlin, Risk, AnalysisResult  # OK
import gremlin
gremlin.__version__  # '0.2.0'
gremlin.__all__      # ['Gremlin', 'Risk', 'AnalysisResult', '__version__']
```

### 4. API Classes (PASS)

| Class | Test | Result |
|-------|------|--------|
| `Gremlin()` | Init without API key | patterns_dir & system_prompt_path exist |
| `Risk(...)` | Create with all fields | `to_dict()` returns correct keys |
| `AnalysisResult(...)` | Create with risks | `has_critical_risks()`, `critical_count` work |

### 5. Output Formats (PASS)

| Format | Test | Result |
|--------|------|--------|
| `to_dict()` | Keys present | scope, risks, matched_domains, pattern_count, depth, threshold, summary |
| `to_json()` | Valid JSON string | 446 chars, parseable |
| `to_junit()` | XML output | Valid XML with `<testsuite>` root |
| `format_for_llm()` | LLM-friendly text | Starts with "Risk Analysis for:" |

### 6. Package Data Integrity (PASS)

| File | Exists | Size | Matches Source |
|------|--------|------|---------------|
| `patterns/breaking.yaml` | Yes | 9,194 bytes | Yes |
| `patterns/code-review.yaml` | Yes | 5,998 bytes | Yes |
| `patterns/incidents/chitram.yaml` | Yes | 1,484 bytes | Yes |
| `prompts/system.md` | Yes | 1,709 bytes | Yes |

**Pattern counts**: 31 universal + 62 domain-specific = **93 total** (matches source)

### 7. End-to-End CLI Analysis (PASS)

```bash
gremlin review "user login with OAuth" -o md
```
- Returned 6 risks (2 CRITICAL, 2 HIGH, 2 MEDIUM)
- Domains correctly detected: auth
- Rich markdown output with severity colors

### 8. End-to-End API Analysis (PARTIAL)

```python
g = Gremlin()
result = g.analyze("file upload for user avatars")
```
- API call succeeds, raw response contains risks
- `result.raw_response` has properly formatted risk output
- **Known issue**: `result.risks` returns empty list (risk parser doesn't extract from markdown format)
- This is a pre-existing API parsing limitation, not a packaging issue
- Same behavior in local dev install

---

## Known Issues

1. **API risk parsing**: `AnalysisResult.risks` is empty when `analyze()` is called programmatically, even though `raw_response` contains valid risk output. The parser expects a different format than what the LLM returns. This affects `has_critical_risks()`, `critical_count`, etc.
   - **Impact**: API users need to parse `raw_response` manually
   - **Workaround**: Use CLI (`-o json`) for structured output
   - **Fix**: Update risk parser in `gremlin/api.py` to handle markdown format

---

## Conclusion

The `gremlin-critic` package is **ready for PyPI publication**. All packaging concerns are validated:
- Package installs cleanly from TestPyPI
- CLI works end-to-end with actual API calls
- All pattern and prompt files are included
- Python API imports and classes function correctly
- Only pre-existing API parsing issue noted (not a packaging regression)
