AI Code Quality Auditor
{{ run_id }} ← all reports
{% if banner_kind == 'dissertation' %} {% elif banner_kind == 'pilot' %} {% endif %}

Assurance overview

Spec set: {{ spec_summary }} · {{ metrics | length }} metrics × {{ conditions | length }} conditions · A concise view of assurance posture for governance and rollout decisions
{% for c in conditions %}
{{ c }}
{% endfor %}
{% for s in summary %}
{{ s.metric }}
{{ '%.2f' % s.best_value }} {{ s.unit }}
Best observed posture: {{ s.best_condition }}
Most challenging posture: {{ s.worst_condition }} ({{ '%.2f' % s.worst_value }})
{{ s.blurb }}
{% endfor %}

Assurance view

Use the toggle to move between calibrated assurance scores and raw values. Calibrated scores are framed around practical decision thresholds; raw values preserve the underlying measurement scale.
This view is designed to support adoption decisions and governance conversations, not to replace expert judgment.

Adoption ranking

A directional view of relative assurance posture. Illustrative only — this is not a weighted procurement score and should be read alongside the metric guidance below.
{% for row in leaderboard %}
{{ row.overall_rank }}
{{ row.condition }}
avg rank {{ row.avg_rank }}
{% if row.wins > 0 %}🏆 {{ row.wins }}{% endif %}
{% endfor %}

Assurance heatmap

Green indicates stronger assurance posture; red highlights areas that warrant attention.

Metric assurance review

Select a metric to review the signal, the threshold guidance, and the implication for rollout.
{% for m in metrics %}
{{ m }}
{% endfor %}
{% for m in metrics %}

{{ m }}

{{ blurbs[m] }}

Unit: {{ units[m] or '—' }} · Lower is better
Decision guidance
{{ metric_guidance[m].axis }}
Adoption implication
{{ metric_guidance[m].adoption }}
{% for c in conditions %} {% endfor %}
ConditionValueRank
{{ c }} {{ '%.3f' % pivot[m][c] }} {{ ranks[m][c] }}
{% endfor %}
{% if provenance %}
Provenance metadata 
{{ provenance | tojson(indent=2) }}
{% endif %}